Difference between revisions of "User:Asisk"
From REU@MU
(→Week 6) |
(→Week 6) |
||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
*Wrote a function to determine where the SSD stop the decreasing trend | *Wrote a function to determine where the SSD stop the decreasing trend | ||
*Looked at the data scaled by 16, 17, 18, 19 | *Looked at the data scaled by 16, 17, 18, 19 | ||
+ | Meeting with Casey and Dr. Merrill (Friday) | ||
+ | **Reviewed scaled data | ||
+ | **Decided to pick scaling factor by matching the area under the curve for the plastic to the area under the curve for the simulation | ||
+ | **Looked at picking a run time (maybe 15 seconds?) | ||
+ | **Talked about writing the research paper | ||
+ | *Looked at area under the curve for the plastic and simulation curves | ||
+ | **Area under the curve for simulation: 20.07 | ||
+ | **Area under the curve for plastic: 1 (since its a PDF) | ||
+ | **Thus a scaling factor of 20 best fits the data |
Revision as of 19:38, 11 July 2016
Contents
Predicting Relative 'Cleanability' from Geometry
Mentors: Dr. Stephen Merrill and Casey O'Brien
Personal Info
My name is Anna Sisk and I am going into my senior year at Marquette University. I am majoring in Mathematics and minoring in Biological Sciences.
Goals for the Summer
- Characterize the distribution from from the CT scans of the plastic models
- Determination of simulation time between plastic and mathematical models
- Use optimizing techniques to minimize particle build up
- Define 'cleanability'
- Apply model to other geometries
Weekly Accomplishments
Week 1
- Orientation to the REU
- Lunch with Dr. Merrill and Casey to determine project and develop a preliminary outline for the summer (Tuesday)
- Two additional meeting with Casey to discuss the different tools and programs we will use, receive background references and information, and work on using Matlab (Wednesday and Friday)
- Research and reading on background information: what the problem is, why it is important, how attention was brought to it, what is being done, ect.
- Practicing different tools on Matlab
- Setting up this wiki page
Week 2
- Meeting with Casey (Monday)
- received PDF and CT scan data
- Continuing Matlab practice
- Meeting with Casey and Dr. Merrill (Tuesday)
- Graphed and plotted the PDFs for model D
- Calculated average of the 5 runs and graphed it
- Read about One-Dimensional Search Methods in Introduction to Methods of Optimization
- Looked into sequential and dichotomous search methods
- Meeting with Casey and Dr. Merrill (Thursday)
- Discussed what to work on and how to make a poster
- Attended Dr. Brylow's Talk on Good Research Talks and Papers (Thursday)
- I am now terrified of grad school
- Rescale graphs, so they accurately reflect PDFs
- Calculated and graphed standard deviation and variance of PDFs
- Started testing for a Poisson distribution
Week 3
- Finished the test for a Poisson distribution
- The data does not appear to fit this distribution
- Working on developing a conceptual model (traffic flow)
- Meeting with Dr. Merrill and Casey (Tuesday)
- Taking the data from Casey's model and matching the mean and variance to the data from the plastic model
- Find out how long Casey's model needs to run so it matches the plastic model data
- Continue working on the conceptual model
- Wrote up a summary for the conceptual model
- Dr. George Corliss' talk on using LaTeX (Thursday)
- Meeting with Dr. Merrill and Casey (Thursday)
- Continued to outline poster and paper
- Talked about different titles
- Discussed conceptual model and how it can inform our thoughts on this project
- Need to come up with a definition of 'cleanability'
- Decided on goals for the next week and and outline for the rest of the summer
- Continued to outline poster and paper
- Drafted a preliminary outline for poster
- Next steps:
- Receive data from Casey's model and determine the correct run time for his model
- Compute the sum of squares and plot it vs time
- Calculate the minimum for the function
- Fit the variance and mean of the two models
- If we are able to validate this specific model, we can then try to apply this method to other plastic models with different geometries
Week 4
- Continued working on poster outline
- Received the simulated data from Casey
- Plotted the data
- Meeting with Casey (Tuesday)
- Talked about mini presentation
- Looked and the data from the simulation and the plastic models
- Talked about interpolating the data so we can calculate the sum of squared differences (SSD)
- Leaned how to interpolate data on MATLAB
- Figured out how to calculate SSD (taking into consideration the plastic and simulated data have different slice sizes)
- Plotted the SSD and fitted a spline curve to it
- Meeting with Casey(Thursday)
- Went over results from SSD
- Simulation parameters may need to be adjusted so the simulation data fits the plastic model data better
- Continued to talked about mini-presentation
- Explained how to create a function on MATLAB
- Worked on slides and outline for mini presentation
- Created a MATLAB function for computing SSD
Week 5
- Worked on powerpoint and talk for mini presentation
- Meeting with Dr. Merrill and Casey (Tuesday)
- Talked about how to give a short research talk
- Gave update on what happened last week
- Discussed ways to get the SSD work
- Finished writing mini-presentation talk and slides
- Received new simulation data
- Mini-Presentation
- Meeting with Dr. Merrill and Casey(Thursday)
- Talked about presentation tips
- Brief update on what I've accomplished this week
- Figured out how to work with new data
- Interpolated simulation data
- Calculated SSD between new simulation data and plastic data average
- Discussed results of SSD with Casey
- Still not looking correct
Week 6
- Happy Fourth of July
- Meeting with Dr. Merrill and Casey (Tuesday)
- Looked at SSD and data calculated last week
- Talked about using scaling to fit the data
- Discussed ways to improve delivering talks
- Worked on scaling plastic data
- scaled in by 10, 15, 20
- Showed results to Casey
- Data looks much better
- Wrote a function to determine where the SSD stop the decreasing trend
- Looked at the data scaled by 16, 17, 18, 19
Meeting with Casey and Dr. Merrill (Friday)
- Reviewed scaled data
- Decided to pick scaling factor by matching the area under the curve for the plastic to the area under the curve for the simulation
- Looked at picking a run time (maybe 15 seconds?)
- Talked about writing the research paper
- Looked at area under the curve for the plastic and simulation curves
- Area under the curve for simulation: 20.07
- Area under the curve for plastic: 1 (since its a PDF)
- Thus a scaling factor of 20 best fits the data